![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
*deep breath* Ok, if you're gonna play at guessing at Moffat Who, sooner or later you have to put your cards on the table. So here's how I see this whole thing going. It's a question of . . . aesthetics. Let me show you:



And that's my 2 cents.
(If you leave a comment and I've disappeared, I'm sorry. I have today off and then life goes sideways for awhile. I will do my best.)



And that's my 2 cents.
(If you leave a comment and I've disappeared, I'm sorry. I have today off and then life goes sideways for awhile. I will do my best.)
(no subject)
Date: 29 Jan 2013 07:04 pm (UTC)It makes ALL THE SENSE IN THE WORLD. I don't know how (*pokes Clara*), but I'm sure she'll be at the centre of everything. (Not sure that she's a Pond though. I'm still more inclined to think Gallifreyan in some way.)
Eggs. It'll be to do with eggs, I just can't see it clearly.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29 Jan 2013 07:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:flowsoffire from LJ
Date: 29 Jan 2013 07:52 pm (UTC)Very nice seeing your thoughts about this anyway =)
Re: flowsoffire from LJ
From:Re: flowsoffire from LJ
From:Re: flowsoffire from LJ
From:Re: flowsoffire from LJ
From:Re: flowsoffire from LJ
From:(no subject)
Date: 29 Jan 2013 09:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29 Jan 2013 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29 Jan 2013 10:09 pm (UTC)I think the Ponds are also still in play, even if they've officially exited, because they're caught up in too many still-running plot threads. Other things we still don't know include: why the TARDIS blew up on Amy and Rory's wedding day, and what's behind that proto-TARDIS in the Lodger and the s6 opener. (Clara has an impeccable sense of time...) There's one other detail I keep coming back to: Amy Pond's house doesn't just have too many rooms, it has too many stories. Literally. It's a two-story house from the outside, and yet on the upper-floor landing there is a very prominent staircase. That just so happens to be identical to the one in the Lodger. It's way too prominent to be a continuity error, especially in a scene that draws attention to the extra room nobody notices. There's an extra story folded into Amy's house that isn't there on the outside.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29 Jan 2013 10:55 pm (UTC)Can't wait to see what's in store for the Doctor, Clara, and River when the new episodes start back up again.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5 Feb 2013 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6 Apr 2013 09:55 pm (UTC)As to what I said above, I think I stopped myself in the middle of falling for the "does everything have to route back to ______? Why can't [writer A/B/C/Moffat] do something new?" fallacy. And I caught myself. After reading this: "Moff is big on going over the same ideas again and again, but he never does them in exactly the same way. He's always building on top of what he did before, revising, circling back around. And he's constantly changing things in ways that don't just alter the immediate situation but everything that came before." from
Bless you both: why on earth should any writer be invalidated for returning to archetypes, messages, imagery that speaks to her, as long as she does so well? And Moffat always does it well, finding something new to see in the old imagery, or finding a new way to use it.
And yes, I'm finally going through a whole bunch of peoples' commentary and meta now. After way too long and after the second half of the season has started.
Oh, I miss my Ponds. I have yet to work through that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: