promethia_tenk: (river scans)
promethia_tenk ([personal profile] promethia_tenk) wrote2011-08-08 01:13 pm

River Stuffs

1) Vid rec: Land's End by [livejournal.com profile] cherryice (River Song, awake in the waiting sea.) OMG, guys, go watch this now. It's . . . a River vid. I mean about River, about her life (and all the rest of their lives, too--I think especially Amy). Anyone struggling with the AGMGTW reveal, I think this might . . . actually . . . help? In a cathartic sense, cause it's not really a pretty picture. At any rate, it's amazing. Go watch many, many times!

2) Question: I've been meaning to ask for awhile, but it seemed very a propos to the vid above ('let the walls cave in'): if I were to write something up comparing River to Echo from Dollhouse, would that be of any interest to anyone but me? It would basically be about both women and their boxes (Echo and the Dollhouse/ River and the TARDIS, the astronaut suit, Stormcage, the Library computer, etc. . . .) and the complicated, push-pull, quasi-symbiotic relationships they have to them. Or is bringing up Dollhouse enough to put everybody off from the get-go?

3) Observation: Watched "The Pandorica Opens" last night for the first time since AGMGTW, and it struck me that that episode makes a lot more sense if you look at it as a systemic attack against River. I mean, obviously the Alliance believes it's all about the Doctor, but I think whoever is pulling the strings is actually after River in some way. Think about it: they locked her husband up in a box so he can't help her, had her father shoot her mother before her mother could even have her, and blew up the time machine that helped make her what she was, on the very date she was conceived. If you put the Doctor in the middle of everything, it doesn't fit together nearly as well, particularly Rory shooting Amy, which always seemed a bit random and 'what was the point in that?' The interesting thing is, though, that if Person Pulling the Strings really was after River, I'm not sure that they were trying to wipe her out so much as unmoor her. If this person knows enough about the TARDIS to be able to remotely control it and cause it to explode, probably they would realize that it would also preserve River inside as she is, even while all the foundations of her life, everything that helped create her, is being destroyed? It's like they wanted River without her context.


[identity profile] sarahandcocoa.livejournal.com 2011-08-09 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Re: Observations about Pandorica - You're so much better than I am at making connections and figuring things out, and you could be really onto something here! It makes a lot of sense when you think about it from a River-centric POV. But who would be trying to stop River from existing? Madam Korvarian wants to adopt and raise her, and the Silents use the Spacesuit to protect her. And why does the Alliance think its the Doctor who makes the TARDIS explode? (Or is it that he caused this whole thing by introducing Amy & Rory into the TARDIS and allowing them to conceive a baby with a 'Time Head' that later becomes his wife?) It's a great idea you have here, but once again we have far too many questions than answers from Moffat!

RE: Vid Rec - it isn't working for me, is it on youtube?

[identity profile] sarahandcocoa.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 09:00 am (UTC)(link)
I get the sense that, in a strange twist, the Alliance will end up being the goodies to Mme Korvarian's baddies. Plus I get a sense from the teasers we've seen so far that River's morality might be played with - especially since, if they don't reclaim her, she'll be brought up as a weapon for evil. It'd be great to see 'time being rewritten' and a very evil River for the remainder of the series that they either have to fix or kill.