I feel like I’ll end up mentioning ‘moving in opposite directions’ sooner or later, and I don’t really want to, so I’ll just issue a blanket Time can be rewritten here. ;) Yeah, it's all kept so up in the air with the way Moff's structured everything . . . (I'll admit too, I have nagging fears about everything with River getting un-happened sometime. Moff wouldn't do that . . . would he? *cringe*)
Can it be his child? Can it be her child? Can it be their child? As far as we know, the answer to all of those is yes. / Would they have one? On a character front it's definitely a complex issue, I agree. Although that could make for some really good storytelling, handled right. And if someone's gonna take a stab at it, I think I want it to be Moff.
And Eleven seems to get along with kids very well – that might be some very clever foreshadowing, or just something about Matt Smith. Well, they hit gold with MS and his interactions with kids, but that trait was definitely written into the character from the very beginning.
We can’t say what River thinks, either. Really, all we know is that she has hidden depths, and that she read to the children in the Library. And how much did that final scene in the Library throw everybody? So many complaints about how that didn't fit her character and Moff's opinions on women blah, blah . . . Thing is, with Moff when something doesn't make sense there's usually a reason.
And there are lies this and names that and rules everywhere – and really, Moffat can just say that all the rules and all the lies are to protect the child. Ooooo, I like that. I like that very much. Protecting time is all well and good, but "Because a child is a stake" is pretty much the #1 reason to do anything in Moff-stories. And lol at the stabilizers!
All the signs point to the girl being Amy and Rory’s – except the fact that she just regenerated. There is the possibility that travelling in time could have affected the baby, like Amy was concerned – but why would travelling in time give the child Time Lord traits? It makes no sense. There is something very . . . clunky about all the signs :-\
Those are my thoughts, at the moment (and they seem really obvious in retrospect). I apologise for any odd sentence structuring and all the unnecessary words – I hope I make some sense. :) Oh great sense! Thank you so much for coming back and sharing. When I've got a theory I love to hash over all of it, so I really appreciate anything anyone can contribute.
no subject
Yeah, it's all kept so up in the air with the way Moff's structured everything . . . (I'll admit too, I have nagging fears about everything with River getting un-happened sometime. Moff wouldn't do that . . . would he? *cringe*)
Can it be his child? Can it be her child? Can it be their child? As far as we know, the answer to all of those is yes. / Would they have one?
On a character front it's definitely a complex issue, I agree. Although that could make for some really good storytelling, handled right. And if someone's gonna take a stab at it, I think I want it to be Moff.
And Eleven seems to get along with kids very well – that might be some very clever foreshadowing, or just something about Matt Smith.
Well, they hit gold with MS and his interactions with kids, but that trait was definitely written into the character from the very beginning.
We can’t say what River thinks, either. Really, all we know is that she has hidden depths, and that she read to the children in the Library.
And how much did that final scene in the Library throw everybody? So many complaints about how that didn't fit her character and Moff's opinions on women blah, blah . . . Thing is, with Moff when something doesn't make sense there's usually a reason.
And there are lies this and names that and rules everywhere – and really, Moffat can just say that all the rules and all the lies are to protect the child.
Ooooo, I like that. I like that very much. Protecting time is all well and good, but "Because a child is a stake" is pretty much the #1 reason to do anything in Moff-stories. And lol at the stabilizers!
All the signs point to the girl being Amy and Rory’s – except the fact that she just regenerated. There is the possibility that travelling in time could have affected the baby, like Amy was concerned – but why would travelling in time give the child Time Lord traits? It makes no sense.
There is something very . . . clunky about all the signs :-\
Those are my thoughts, at the moment (and they seem really obvious in retrospect). I apologise for any odd sentence structuring and all the unnecessary words – I hope I make some sense. :)
Oh great sense! Thank you so much for coming back and sharing. When I've got a theory I love to hash over all of it, so I really appreciate anything anyone can contribute.